Embedded Medical Monitor
Our co-founder and CMO, Dr. Dipali Patel, is an experienced medical monitor closely with our site investigators. Any questions get an expert level response quickly, not automated replies.
Stryde clinical research sites are embedded within specialty practices, owned by physicians with years of clinical experience and subject matter knowledge, and more importantly, extensive knowledge of their patients' history. Our investigators and dedicated patient recruitment specialists work together to shorten enrollment timelines, evidenced by our published numbers.
Request FeasibilityShort Answer: Keep Stryde in mind when your protocol needs patient enrollment in outpatient specialty therapeutic areas, when diversity targets matter, or when your study needs additional rescue sites. Our organization is fully integrated into community (or physician-owned) specialty practices that routinely see potentially eligible patients. These patients place their trust in their provider, and our physician investigators put their trust in us to operate seamlessly within their practice.
Our co-founder and CMO, Dr. Dipali Patel, is an experienced medical monitor closely with our site investigators. Any questions get an expert level response quickly, not automated replies.
Our practices serve the community they reside, with enrollment and treatment diversity an integral part of our model.
NIH IBC-RMS approval for advanced therapy studies.
Multi-regional investigator network operate under a single organization, with central regulatory, quality and finance teams supporting clinical operations at each of our sites.
Benchmarks are on our performance board; see the full community-versus-academic comparison.
Bottom-up, never from prevalence. Active patient counts from practice EMRs, protocol filters applied in sequence, realistic screen-failure rates by study type, and coordinator capacity applied as a hard ceiling. The result is a number we would actually commit to. The full method, with a worked example, is on how we build an enrollment number.
Our operating rule: we would rather commit to 30 and deliver 35 than promise 50 and explain later.
Outpatient enrollment at the treatment-decision moment; diversity targets; rescue timelines
Complex inpatient protocols; first-in-human units; KOL-anchored science
The practice's own panel, already in the EMR
Referrals, often after key treatment decisions were made elsewhere
6.5-week network median; as fast as two weeks when sponsor needs and documents allow
Published medians of 69 days (university) to 167 days (cancer centers)
Existing physician relationship; visits at the patient's usual clinic
Study-built relationship
Benchmark sources are on the performance board; read the full community sites vs academic centers comparison.
Inpatient Phase 1 and Outpatient Phase 2–4 in dermatology, rheumatology, and our active specialties.
Studies with modalities that require an infusion or injectable protocol with cold chain storage in place.
Rare disease work where Community Specialists hold the panel.
Protocols with FDA diversity action plan targets.
Studies needing rescue sites with pre-tagged eligible patients.
Indications requiring infrastructure our practices do not offer; an academic site may serve you better, and we will say so in the feasibility response.
Plenty of networks claim fast feasibility. Ours is a guarantee, with a published and tracked response-time median on our performance board, and an honest no within 4 hours when a protocol needs longer. Preliminary means PI interest, estimated eligible population from real network data, a realistic enrollment range, and capability fit. The full response with EMR queries follows.
Want outcomes, not claims? See network results. Before the pitch, see our live performance metrics, enrollment results from real studies, or the way we build enrollment numbers.